In the UK, mainland Europe and beyond, planners and elected representatives all face a common problem – namely, that there is a pressure to house and provide essential services and infrastructure to meet the rapidly changing and diversifying needs of our increasingly populated urban environments. When the question of developing on greenfield sites is mooted, there is a shared discomfort amongst officers and elected members in municipal authorities across national borders. How are we to meet the needs of our citizens, to help those yet to achieve the goal of property ownership and a room of one’s own?

Brownfield development in the UK has been the subject of lively debate in recent years. What about the value of the land when it is less desirable to develop than greenfield? What can be done to make the sites really work for future citizens? In general, former industrial brownfield sites are more accessible than greenfield sites, due to their proximity to urban cores which is a result of past infrastructure development patterns (Green, 2003-2004). These sites are ideal for redevelopment since they are connected to existing infrastructure. This provides potential for developments that facilitate walking, biking and other types of denser developments closer to centres.

Most importantly, development of brownfields can result in savings on infrastructure spending on new suburban roads and sewer lines (Davis and Sherman, 2010). What’s more Carbon sequestration in the soils of U.K.’s urban brownfields has the potential to meet 10 percent of the U.K.’s annual CO2 reduction target. Mark Goddard, ecologist at Newcastle University argues that ‘Of course, some urban brownfield sites have such a high nature conservation value that they warrant long-term protection. We don’t have many early successional habitats left in the U.K., and since 2007, ‘Open Mosaic Habitats on Previously Developed Land’ have been a priority habitat in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP). Despite this recognition, there remain few instances of biodiversity taking precedence over development when it comes to building on a prime brownfield site.’

So, How do we make the most of the added value of developing these areas and potentially saving our green and pleasant lands? The answer, in part, lies with nature based solutions, particularly creative SuDs and tree planting. Soil compaction, toxicity and residual obstacles below ground constitute some of the main challenges to regenerating brownfield site, but at GreenBlue Urban we like a challenge …

Although the time taken for ecosystems services to be delivered at full capacity may be longer on brownfield than greenfield sites, it is undoubtedly the case that integrating trees and SuDs schemes on site will accelerate the process of revitalising and rejuvenating the land and surrounding environment. This will enable Developers to achieve the maximum added value on site, biodiversity benefits, improve air quality and provide aesthetic, green conduits around the development, and from the site to the town centre.

Using a constructed ecosystems approach, integrating systems such as Arborflow, enables Developers to integrate new areas of greenspace around complex infrastructure needs on site. There are often complex issues surrounding land ownership and maintenance on brownfield sites and so the choice of maintenance free options such as a RootSpace soil support system provides all stakeholders with the assurance that costly remedial works post development will be unnecessary. The advantage of using modular systems on sites where soil quality is perhaps inadequate and recovering from contamination, is that the modular systems can be built up and filled with good quality soil to ensure that integrated mature trees and SuDs systems remain unhampered by such constraints. Cleaning the water on brownfield sites is also of primary concern and so using SuDs compatible tree pit designs to provide that added value and water treatment is a cost-effective way to mitigate the effects of previous land use. Using linked tree pits and exploiting the open structure of the RootSpace system will enable an easy installation in and around existing underground infrastructure such as utility pipes.

GreenBlue Urban has assisted with many Brownfield developments including the Olympic Park London and Diglis Basin, Worcester and many more.

Mature trees and SuDs designs can be integrated into what are termed ‘carbon capture’ gardens, supporting a diverse range of flora and fauna and the example below from Leipzig, shows just how valuable, multifunctional green space can be achieved on brownfield:

An urban brownfield supporting a diverse flora in Leipzig, Germany. Photo © Mark Goddard

Using brownfield to create attractive pop up parks with mature trees and a simple SUDs scheme can promote social cohesion and connectivity between existing developments.

New Pocket Park in Balsall Heath, corner of Haden Way and Moseley Road in Birmingham. Photo by Abdullah Rheman

 

In conclusion, with a little perseverance and imagination, there a lot more space to exploit and we can take care of our natural environment whilst realising the potential to create more space to cope with the increased demand for development.

Related Posts

A Model for Future Planning: Innovative Stormwater Management at the Nine Elms Development

We all know that to fully realise the potential of green infrastructure across our ever expanding urban environments, new and adaptive funding mechanisms must be put in place to ensure the long term maintenance of …

Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards

Problems with ANGST?  Then you might need some Vitamin G – A dose of ‘greenspace’ could be just what the Doctor ordered.Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards, valuing natural capital and means of surveying people’s ability to …

Pitfalls & Challenges in Urban Tree Planting

We all know the importance of trees in our cities, however urban trees are often neglected and do not receive the appropriate care they require in urban settings. Each of these photos tell a story of neglect, …